منابع مشابه
Comments on Ludwig Wittgenstein ’ s Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics 1 ( 1959 )
The following comments are concerned with a book that is the second part of the posthumous publications of selected fragments from Wittgenstein in which he sets forth his later philosophy. The necessity of making a selection and the fragmentary character noticeable at points are not overly problematic, since in his publications Wittgenstein refrains from a systematic presentation anyway and exp...
متن کامل“You don’t have to be Ludwig Wittgenstein”: How Llewellyn’s Concept of Agreement Should Change the Law of Open-quantity Contracts
In this article, Professor Allen Blair examines the preeminent role of exclusivity in open-quantity contracts under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). Although the text of the UCC does not mandate that open-quantity contracts be exclusive, the vast majority of courts considering the issue have held that exclusivity is necessary to prevent such contracts from failing for lack of mutuality of o...
متن کاملWittgenstein, medicine and neuropsychiatry.
A historical review is presented of the link between Ludwig Wittgenstein, considered the most important philosopher of the 20th century, and medicine, particularly neurology and psychiatry. Wittgenstein worked as a porter at Guy's Hospital in London, and then as a technician at the Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle. He wrote about his important insights into language, and neuroscience. It h...
متن کاملWittgenstein on Believing
The outlines of Wittgenstein’s conception of propositions can be sketched by means of the following four or five points. First, in 1913 Wittgenstein focuses on whatever it is that judgments have in common that allows them to depict a sense and express a thought. In so doing Wittgenstein is pressing to find a sense or proposition – what is believed in -of concern to logic and independent of psyc...
متن کاملWittgenstein, Locality and Rules
This paper tries to give some substance to local holism, a picture that seems to fit Wittgenstein’s analysis of the working of language. In the first part I state the well-known paradox of semantic holism, as discussed in philosophy of language: if meaning is holistic there is no possibility to share any meaning. In the second part I present the different answers to this paradox, from atomism t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Pro-Fil
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1212-9097
DOI: 10.5817/pf11-1-17